For The Scrap Heap This Week – Insurance And Other Commissions

Should strata law be simplified? This week, we challenge conventional wisdom on disclosure laws and the three-quote rule for insurance renewal. Share your thoughts and explore our Strata Conflicts Disclosure Toolkit today!

By
Michael Teys
on
February 15, 2025
Category:
Governance

Each week, as a counter measure to the out-of-control pace of strata law reform nationally, I consider a strata law, which has become conventional wisdom, and whether it should be scrapped to make strata management better. 

If insurance commissions are to be banned (as they should be), we should remove s 60. Commissions and benefits from related party transaction income resulting from vertical integration is properly dealt with by the common law and the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) (s 249B - 249D). 

The current disclosure provisions have not worked. They legitimise transactions that are, or should be, unlawful. The codified nature of present disclosure laws limits consumers’ rights. They are less than those afforded under the common law of fiduciaries. 

Repealing the three quote rule for insurance renewal simplifies strata management business. 

So what do you think? Scrap it, or save it?

Whatever you think, for now at least, disclosure is necessary. You can buy our strata Conflicts Disclosure toolkit here.

Tags:
No items found.
Michael Teys

Michael Teys is the Founder and Chairman of The Strata Professionals Australia. He brings together more than 30 years of specialist strata law practice, a decade of strata business ownership, and an active programme of academic research into multi-owned property governance.